« With Muslims Like These, Who Needs Kaafirs? - Part 2 | Main | Blind Tawakkul »
February 20, 2004
Big Wigs, Apologists, and the Islamic Revolution

by Rami Mahmoud Elsawah

God is the greatest…but C-span is great.

I love C-span. I like to think it makes me smart. After all, I get the news way before everyone else…virgin and unedited. So along with my vhs library of Star Wars, Harry Potter, and Taraweeh Prayers from Mecca…are clips from C-span. I watch exhilarating Senate subcommittee meetings, Armed Services Committee meetings (just to hear Senator Byrd speak)…and for kicks; British Parliament. I’ve been told that I’m a 60 year old man trapped in a 22 year old’s body…and I love it.

But why am I explaining this to you on an Hidaya? It’s definitely not to attract future marriage prospects…It’s to tell you that somewhere far far away in our nation’s capital, some Big Wig politicians are determining the fate of your life as Muslims and the way you live and practice Islam. You don’t think that there are big parts of America trying to go to war with Muslims?…I have the tapes to prove you wrong.

Let me explain why. When the Senate holds its meetings they always need someone to talk to. So if it’s the Senate Appropriations Committee they might choose to bring in Alan Greenspan and ask him a few questions about why our economy is going so far down the drain. The Senate Armed Services Committee would probably want to bring in Paul Wolfowitz or Donald Rumsfeld to answer to the massacre of US soldiers currently happening in Iraq. Whatever the case may be the Senate committees and subcommittees will always bring in “experts” on the subject at hand to testify formally on their opinions and advice on the matter.

You will see when you watch some of these hearings that many of these “experts” who are brought in are really nothing more than people in high positions, or famous names, who really have very little or very skewed knowledge and understanding of the subject. As you will see, when the Senate is dealing on the subjects of Islam (which they do much more than you think)…the ones who represent Islam and its followers are neither Muslim nor have any first hand experience with Islam and Muslims.

For instance, when the Senate Intelligence Committee was investigating the government’s ability in preventing the events of 9/11 they brought in as “experts”: an author on Jihad and Islam, a member of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), a French ambassador, and an American Historian. The hearing starts by one of the Senators praising the author (whom I will leave unnamed) on his book and begins to ask him about Islam and Muslims. The Author says: “Islam this…Terrorists that…we have to do something about that religion…we have to start an Islamic Revolution!”…I kid you not. Then spoke the woman from CFR…her whole speech was practically written by the folks from Project for a New American Century…After all, she is from CFR, the brains behind American foreign policy and its 21st century crusade against the Muslim world. She agrees with the author that we need to start a revolution in Islam, but says that we must do so indirectly, by supporting reformists and apologists (The Muslim Uncle Tom). She’s smart, and not as crazed and blood thirsty as the author is.

Lets take a closer look at these two people first before we proceed. Both of these people (from the way they spoke) have a perspective of Islam only from the viewpoint of research and third-party knowledge. One is a politician (looking to meet political objectives), the other is a writer (who has a clear hatred and bias for Muslims). Both have very little to no first hand experience and knowledge of Muslims…and both have an agenda at hand. One must ask themselves why then are they allowed to advise the nation’s policymakers on a subject which they are not fit to advise on.

Let us continue…The historian and the Frenchman give factual information, first-hand experience, and very little of skewed personal perspective. The Frenchman more so than the Historian. The historian spoke well because he speaks with a wide knowledge of historical fact, and knowledge of past policies and actions taken in the Middle East. Yet his experiences are solely from books and research rather than actual exerience. The French ambassador spoke well because he has actual experience with the Muslim world and has seen the history unfolded firsthand from the comfortable view of an unagressive continent. He is also a statesman and therefore has in-depth knowledge of worldwide political policies directed at the Middle East. He stated practically down to the ‘T’ everything leading up to 9/11: from the creation of the State of Israel, to the creation of Bin Laden and the Mujahideen by the US, to the broken promises and double standards of the US to the Middle East…till today. All this creating in the Muslim World: 1) Poverty 2) Anger 3) Distrust, all of which leads up to today’s current issues.

Even though in this particular instance there was an opposing view, I’ve seen other meetings dealing with the subject of Islam and Muslims in which there is no opposing viewpoint. They information is given by people with limited perspective and many times are motivated by personal agendas and hatreds. They are neither well rounded nor well informed…yet merely take a viewpoint and find some sources to back it. This can be potentially dangerous, since in order to make sound decisions and make wise judgments…let alone run a nation…one must have unbiased, fair, and balanced information. What you will get from these Muslim-haters, apologists, reformists, and apostates will always…and I mean always…be false information.

Falsehood

The job of Intelligence agencies, such as the CIA and MI-6 is to find out exactly what is happening in the world (Gather data), figure out where these things are leading to (Formulate hypothesis), find hard evidence to prove their hypothesis (Develop theory), then report their finding to the man in charge, namely the executive branch (Formulate conclusion). This is the same way we write essays for examinations, make scientific experimentations, and even formulates how we do things in regular life…like buying a car.

But in the case of the faulty Iraq intelligence you have something else happening…the process is reversed. The Executive branch begins the process by intelligence agencies that such and such a thing is happening in the world first (Iraq is building WMD’s) and then calls on them to find the intelligence to prove it. The intelligence community then goes scattering around looking for any evidence of such and such a thing going on (Iraq building WMD’s). The Executive branch, confident in the ability of its intelligence agencies to find something…goes ahead with its speeches and its propaganda campaign. Then, when the intelligence community can find no evidence to support the theory of the President, and since it would be too costly for the President to go back on his claim, thousands of troops are sent to die in order to show conviction to the world that the claim of the President , the Vice President, the Secretary of State, Donny, Condi, Wolfy and all the other Big Wigs benefiting from no-bid contracts, Northrup-Grumann’s rising stocks, and the dream of renewing America’s ‘Manifest Destiny”, is true.

Things just aren’t suppose to work that way. Yet this is the same way these so called “scholars” and “experts”, who are the ones to represent Islam to our lawmakers, gather their intelligence and write their books. The soul agenda of many of these people is no different than that of the Quraish at the time of the Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him. That is, to combat the movement of Islam by slandering, lying, and eventually outright violence. We can that see today just as the Muslims in Mecca could see it fourteen hundred years ago…just like the Christians could see it in the prelude to the Roman persecutions. Look carefully and read between the lines…read the transcripts from The State of the Union speech…look at where military forces are concentrated today and you will see that there are people in America in positions of policymaking that are itching to go to war with the Muslims and the Islamic movement. Yet also remember that you can plan and plan as you like, but that Allah is the best of planners.

Thousands of people in the right here in the U.S. are turning to Islam each year. Every year more and more people are discovering what Islam is really about…and how it is helps them to grow both spiritually and mentally, to find peace and purpose of life. Most of them, as you will see, discovered it on their own (from reading and researching) or from having known a Muslim and finding in them something which they don’t see in anyone else. Yet the only thing a person ever has to do to teach another person Islam is to be a good person. The sole purpose of religion is to make ourselves better in character and conduct…so being the embodiment of good character is to give Da’wa of our Religion. Alhamdullilah, tens of thousands of people worldwide are becoming Muslims each year…and it’s scaring to death so many of these people who always fear what they don’t know…and so many of whom don’t want to know.

The Islamic Revolution

Now let me explain to you the ‘Islamic Revolution’ led, in one part by Muslim apologists and reformists and in the other part by militant groups like Al-Qaeda. In Islam, these parties are both the extremes.

To the reformists and the apologists, many of the things that are the key tenets of Islam…such as the Jihad and the Hijab for example…are perceived to be simply incorrect or out of date. Yet in Islam everyone is entitled to their opinion and you cannot be judged by anyone but Allah alone. That is why Alhamdullilah (all thanks to God), that caste and clergy are simply nonexistent in Islam. But what sets these people apart from you average complainer is that they are very keen to creating Fitnah (tribulations and divisions). A Muslim reformist will claim the Hijab is abuse, repressive, and not an obligation…and then she will tell it to every non-Muslim she sees. Rather than using clear evidence, reason, or scholarly arguing she takes her argument to non-Muslims…painting the image of Islam with darkened colors and hoping to paint themselves as a shining light. Or we can look at the apologists…who are dying to eat the scraps of the table of their masters. They have no pride in their Islam an in being Muslim. They will say “If you don’t like it, leave it”, they hide and run around the fact of Jihad, they are so quick to denounce other Muslims and Muslim countries. If they only stopped to think that the true nature of America its democracy is “If you don’t like it, change it”, that rules of engagement in Jihad are so strict that modern warfare as it is fought is unacceptable, and that so much of what has happened to our Muslim countries today are the result of direct interference from foreign superpowers, colonialism, and the race to control the abundant natural resources which they all sit on.

I dare any one of these people who call themselves reformers or rationalists to show me the real evidence that the doctrines they abide to are made through reason or that Islam is in need of a reformation. I have met and debated with such people. You will find that most are just running away from a false idea or a painful past…which they would rather choose to suppress or to fight…than to use logic, science, or rational thinking in achieving their methodology. They want a revolution of Islam...and they want to be the frontrunners of it.

As for the extremists on the other side…well…we all know it too well. We are reminded of it…and blamed for it…more times than we can blink our eyes. But it does happen…and it’s a sad case…but they too want to create a revolution in Islam…and they too want to be the frontrunners of it.

So let me tell you a quote, by Czar Nicholas of Russia (or at least the actor who played Czar Nicholas in the movie):

“A strong man does not desire power…and a weak man is corrupted by it.”

Think about that real hard. What does that say to you about all these people trying to make a mockery of our beautiful religion? Look at the leaders of other revolutionary movements. They touted reform…but their only real motivation was power. Lenin, Castro, Khomeini, Chalabi, Mussolini. What does that say about all these politicians who will to beat each other bloody with lies and money to hold a seat of power? What does this say about our Muslim ‘Uncle Toms”; reformists and apologist who put down other Muslims with claims of “backwardness” and “ignorance” in order to be the forerunners of a Westernized Islamic designer imposter...and to ultimately only serve their slaves master on-high.

In the end truth cannot be blotted out…truth does not need you…nor can truth be extinguished…because Allah is the sole bearer of Truth…and Allah is the Greatest, the Everlasting.


May Allah grant us Knowledge and Strength.


of and relating to...
Wajahat Gilani said

assalaamualaikum,

Alhamdulilah you brought this topic to light. I believe the first thing we need to do is to call things and people for what or who they are. As muslims, we have no such definition of conservative, liberal, reformist, etc. We need to all start calling it what it is..EXTREMISM. These people are extremists! Islam is the middle way. Middle implies 2 points, 2 extremas! Too hot too cold, too high too low, too fast too slow. The media and muslims in general have only focused on the one extremism, Al-Qaeda, etc. What about the other extremists? What about the extremists that want to stop hijab, reinterpret the Quran and Sunnah, and lock away the ulema. Those militant terrorists want to blow up buildings, but these terrorists are much worse, they want to implode our souls.

So I say, we must stop playing these word games, and call people for who they are, extremists! And their selling out is nothing more than spiritual terrorism!

walaikumsalaam
Wajahat Gilani

on February 21, 2004 11:56 AM
Ayman said

excellent!

truth does not need you

-A

on February 22, 2004 12:25 AM
Mike said

Hello, I'm a friend of a Muslim trying to get me to convert to Islam, so I figured you'd be able to answer this question. Are you suggesting that 'moderate Muslims' are worse than Osama bin Laden and his clan? I understand you have your beliefs, such as that the hijab is mandatory, but people who challenge that assumption are certainly not as troublesome as those who declare "kill the americans, wherever you may find them." Doesn't that make any sense?
The other thing is, I fail to understand the problem with 'moderate Muslims.' My friend (who I will leave unnamed) is a 'moderate Muslim', yet still deeply committed to his faith. For example, he supports the hijab, but he opposes laws in Muslim countries that make it mandatory (like in Saudi Arabia)... What's so terrible about such a position?
Any feedback would be appreciated.

on February 23, 2004 7:25 AM
Gillette aka Hassan Khaja said

to Mike,

"Hello, I'm a friend of a Muslim trying to get me to convert to Islam, so I figured you'd be able to answer this question. Are you suggesting that 'moderate Muslims' are worse than Osama bin Laden and his clan? I understand you have your beliefs, such as that the hijab is mandatory, but people who challenge that assumption are certainly not as troublesome as those who declare 'kill the americans, wherever you may find them.' Doesn't that make any sense?"

It's pretty well-known among Muslims that killing civilians is forbidden. It's safe to say that few people will buy into Osama bin Laden's line of thinking. However, it is more likely for people to think that the hijab is not mandatory and spread it among other people due to the context in which we live.

"The other thing is, I fail to understand the problem with 'moderate Muslims.' My friend (who I will leave unnamed) is a 'moderate Muslim', yet still deeply committed to his faith. For example, he supports the hijab, but he opposes laws in Muslim countries that make it mandatory (like in Saudi Arabia)... What's so terrible about such a position?
Any feedback would be appreciated."

I think the author is trying to address "moderate Muslims" who think that Islam is an old and outdated religion, and that it needs reform because people outside the religion say it needs a reform.

on February 23, 2004 8:59 AM
Wajahat Gilani said

Assalaamualaikum Mike,

That is the problem with using these words, what defines "moderate","liberal","conservative", etc. As Hassan said, Bin Laden doesn't represent Islam, our shuyukh do. When I speak about the other spectrum of extremists, I'm talking about people like the Turkish government, Muslims that are preventing fellow muslim women from wearing hijabs, and when an educated women in Turkey that covers tried to take a stand in their Parliment, men and women both treated her with such disrespect shouting and slurring horrible statements. Those people, by all means, are extremists.

I personally agree with your friend about government not getting involved.

The Quran says 'There is no compulsion in religion'. (2:256)

Those issues should be left to the family.

walaikumsalaam
Wajahat Gilani

on February 23, 2004 11:34 AM
Rami said


Salaams Mike,

I'm sorry if I left any ambiguity in my article...I hope I can express or what I was talking about.

In Islam the word excommunication is simply non-existent. Despite what is mostly though about the three major religions; Islam is not an "organized" religion. That is to say, a Sheikh or Imam is merely a title give to scholars and muslim leaders. In Islam, the one who leads prayer is the one with the most Qu'ran memorized...regardless of whether he is a Sheikh (a person hoding a Masters degree or higher in Islamic Studies) or not. It's much like you would find in the Buddhist traditions, that is to say that the most knowledgable one would be the teacher and leader.

Now as you will find, this is a double edged sword. That is to say that I can say anything I want, DO anything I want, and no matter how terrible it is...even though you may simply be using the title of "Muslim" merely as a name, and even though everyone around you knows you're a hypocrite and calls you so...you have no-one to answer to except Allah. There is no such thing as mosque membership, nor is there any means of excommnication, which is why in Mecca and Medina everyone, whether Sunni, Shi'a, Sufi, etc is not prohibited from comiing to worship.

So when Osama claims himself to be a Sheikh (A scholar), or when Osama declares 'Jihad' (which only the leader of the Muslims Ummah can do)...and such a person has not existed for centuries.

Osama also want to purge the world of Mulims who don't fit into his scheme of plans. So when you think 9/11...think that 500 of the 3,000, (1/6), of those who died were Muslims. The Muslims of America also suffered a great loss on 9/11...and felt a great pain as well.

So that is one extreme.

The other extreme: As I said, if for example a Muslim woman chooses not to cover...fine. If She doesn't believe it's mandatory...fine. If she tries to argue with other Muslims that it's not mandatory...fine. That is not being argued.

But if you Mike, were wishing to learn about Islam...what do you want to hear? The truth. So if you go to a person siding with Osama he's gonna tell you "Yes, it is a Muslims job to kill all those living in America...look at so and so a verse in the Quran". If you go to the other they'll say "Of course the muslims around the world are wrong about the Hijab...look at so and so a verse in the Qu'ran". And so on. But Islam is real knowledge is not a verse that you pick out without reading the whole Sura (collective verses). When we look for informatio about Hijab we also look at History...and you will find that there is a well documented incident with the Muslims at the time of Muhammed (PBUH) when a Medinan Jew tacked a Muslim woman's Abaya(Muslim clothing) to a wall, so that when she tried to move her clothes were ripped off. It started a big incident in Medina and was therefore recorded historically..and so we reference to History as well as Qu'ran. The same for Osama...he picks a verse, and then fails to read the ones before and after it...the two are just alike.

They're both spreading false information...and in doing so are trying to ruin Islam. The do so by talking behind the backs of the Muslim people and spreading the false information to either those who also wish to fight Islam, or those who are not knowledgable about it. It is no different than a woman slandering another, and spreading false rumors about her, just to have poeple look at her the way she looks at her.

And Mike, the poeple who spread false information..especially in testimony to our lawmakers...or in influence to American politics and poilicy...whether they be doing so against Islam or against tax laws...is causing trouble. If you don't believe me look at Iraq. The ex-Iraqi nationals who had such a bitter desire to see Saddam gone, and see themselves on the throne...are the ones who were swearing back and forth that the US troops would be welcomed with loving arms and that they pwould never be offered resistance. Now...Hundreds of troops are dead, and thousands (which the media never reports on) are wounded, and 100,000+ troops are fighting to save theirs. All because the executive branch listened to what what they said to them, and what they were told by these people (who are now are on the Iraqi Governing council). That's because what they said was said from a viewpoint of a person with a bitter hatred and a longing for power...and it's no different from what these "extremists" are doing now. All because of hatred and power.

May Allah grant us all guidance.

on February 23, 2004 3:43 PM
j said

Islam is a false religion. All religions that do not recognize Jesus Christ as Lord are, by definition, false.
"You shall know a tree by its fruit," Jesus tells us. One need look no farther than the recent horror my Muslims at the school in Russia to see the fruit of Islam.
Allah is not god; he is Satan.

on September 4, 2004 7:11 PM
Faisal Akhtar said

Finally a non-muslim comments here. I wish I could debate that last comment with you J but I doubt that you'll ever come back since you might be one of those mindless Muslim bashers who are not much aware of the critical issues facing humanity. But if you are not, and I hope you are not, please reply to this post since I didn't understand you completely. What do you mean by definition false?

on September 4, 2004 10:09 PM
Justoju said

"All religions that do not recognize Jesus Christ as Lord are, by definition, false."

You are right J. We are the intolerant ones.

on September 6, 2004 11:39 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?